HTTrack vs wget vs Online Copiers
Both classics can mirror websites; both were designed before JavaScript rendering ate the web. Here is where each fits in 2026.
wget
Perfect for scripted mirrors of truly static sites (docs, blogs, archives) with 'wget --mirror --convert-links'. No JS execution, cryptic errors, and CDN assets require careful domain flags. A power tool for terminal users.
HTTrack
A friendlier GUI over the same idea, with resumable crawls and filters. Same fundamental limits: no JavaScript rendering, struggles with cross-domain assets, Windows-first.
Online copiers
HTTrack Online mirrors sites from the browser, follows builder CDNs (Framer, Wix, Webflow) automatically, rewrites URLs across HTML, CSS and JS, and needs no install. The trade-off: it targets public sites, not authenticated intranets.
Verdict
Static site plus terminal comfort: wget. Old-school site plus Windows: HTTrack still works. Anything built with a modern site builder, or any machine you cannot install software on: use the online copier.
Copy a website right now
No install, no signup: one URL in, one ZIP out.